Skip to content
Unmanned Systems / Aerial Drones

FPV drones on a cable: Russia increasingly deploys wire-guided drones

What began in February as a wreckage find and was still seen as an experiment in summer now worries Ukrainian drone experts: wire-guided FPV drones are immune to jammers, deliver better images and hit extremely accurately.

FPV drones on a cable: Russia increasingly deploys wire-guided drones
© Highcat

In February, Ukrainian forces for the first time came across the wreckage of a Russian first-person view (FPV) drone attached to a ten-kilometre fibre-optic cable. Further Russian flights using this technique were recorded in the summer, but Ukraine classified them as “experiments”. Now, however, Ukrainian drone warfare specialists are sounding the alarm: Russia is using wire-guided FPV drones more and more often, and the technique is proving extremely accurate.

Kabelgelenkte russische FPV-Drohne
This Russian FPV drone, already rendered safe by the Ukrainian demining service, flew nine kilometres under wire guidance. · © Archiv

An old principle: guidance by wire

The first experiments took place as early as the Second World War; from the end of the 1950s, wire-guided anti-tank missiles then became widespread.

Their advantage: the gunner can steer the missile in flight without needing a radio channel. Electronic countermeasures (jamming) therefore cannot disrupt them. And because no frequencies are occupied, many such missiles can be used simultaneously in a confined area.

In the West, HOT, TOW and Milan are among the best-known examples. In the Austrian Armed Forces (Bundesheer), the Bill 2000 anti-tank guided weapon is controlled in this way.

T-64 mit Minenpflug
Moments before impact: this T-64 with a mine plough is about to be hit. · © Archiv

FPV drones without a radio link

FPV drones are mostly radio-controlled. This requires one channel from the controller to the drone and a second one that carries the image from the drone back to the controller. Warning receivers such as the so-called “Sukork” can detect these signals and alert those carrying them. When jammers are activated, the radio transmission of the enemy drone can be disrupted, rendering the drone harmless.

With wire-guided drones this does not work: no warning receiver goes off, no jammer can interfere, and the pilot's transmitter cannot be located electronically. On top of that, the FPV pilot gets a much better image. While radio-controlled FPV drones require relatively great effort for a very poor image, the wire-guided drone transmits high-resolution, smooth video.

Leopard 2 im Ukraine-Krieg
Jamming is useless. Neither the warning receiver nor the usual jammers protect against wire-guided drones. Here a Leopard 2 is being attacked. · © Archiv

Ever greater ranges

For anti-tank missiles, the range grew from an initial two kilometres to four kilometres later and to five to eight kilometres in the latest generations. In Ukraine, by contrast, a wire-guided FPV drone that had flown nine kilometres was found as early as the end of September. Chinese dealers now offer components with 20 kilometres of cable.

In Ukraine there are therefore calls to develop ideas against the new threat. There is certainly cause for concern: even a hit on a Leopard 2 has already been documented (see image above).

In Germany, the company Highcat is experimenting with wire-guided drones (see top image).

Photo credits

© Highcat · © Archiv
Advertisement336 × 280
Perimeter Protection 2027 – Secure ticket now! 19–21 January 2027, Nuremberg (incontent)

Continue exploring

The week in unmanned systems.